Why Can’t Yoga Just Be an Exercise?

MB asks: “While it’s true that most yoga positions are designed to be positions of worship to Hindu gods, I find it hard to believe that there’s any danger in practicing them when it’s just being done as an exercise.”

Let’s look at this from a purely logical point of view. First of all, anyone who truly understands yoga (such as a Hindu) will tell you that yoga positions were never designed to be exercises. They were designed to do one of two things – worship one of more than three million Hindu gods and/or facilitate the flow of prana (life force energy) through the body.

As Fr. Pacwa states in his book, Catholics and the New Age, ” . . . (H)indus did not devise these exercises for athletic limbering or muscle building. All were meant to lead the practitioner to enlightenment and awareness of his or her inner divinity.” (pg. 33).

Legendary guru B.K.S. Iyengar confirms this in his book, Light on Yoga, where he says that some yoga positions “are also called after gods of the Hindu pantheon and some recall the Avataras, or incarnation of Divine Power.”

Having said all that, we come to a purely logical conclusion – it’s not possible to “just do them as an exercise” when the so-called “exercises” aren’t just exercises.

That would be like saying the sign of the cross can be used as a triceps exercise. Sure, you can use it that way, but it’s not – and never will be – a triceps exercise. Like yoga positions, it can never be a mere “physical action” or “neutral” because it has a profound spiritual meaning.

Others attempt to lend Christian names to these poses, or to pray the Rosary while practicing them; however, none of these actions negates the intrinsic Hindu meanings in these poses, at least not according to Bishop Norberto Carerra.

In his pastoral instruction on the New AgeA Call to Vigilance: Pastoral Instruction on New Age, Bishop Carerra writes: “However much proponents insist that these techniques are valuable as methods, and imply no teaching contrary to Christianity, the techniques in themselves . . . in their own context, the postures and exercises, are designed for their specific religious purpose. Even when they are carried out within a Christian atmosphere, the intrinsic meaning of these gestures remains intact.”

So even if you think you’re stretching your back, if you’re using the Sun Stretch to do so, whether you intend to or not, you’re still posing in a position of worship to the Sun god because that’s what this pose was designed to do. It was never designed as a back stretch.

My advice is that if the idea of posing yourself in a position of worship to a Hindu god is even remotely bothersome to you, stop doing it. There are plenty of other exercises/stretches you can do that work just as well as yoga.

© All Rights Reserved, Living His Life Abundantly®/Women of Grace®  http://www.womenofgrace.com

2 Response to “Why Can’t Yoga Just Be an Exercise?

  1. Thank you so much for making this so clear!
    I now have complete confidence in making this plain to others,
    who see no wrong in practicing yoga, while being Catholic.
    I was wondering if there was a type of yoga that could be
    practiced without the “religious element”, now I know that
    this is not the case!

    God bless you in your much needed work,
    Eleanor Houston.

  2. My Hindu friend told me – in Hinduism, God is whatever you want it to be, but the greatest of these is the Surya Bhagwan (the sun god). The sun salutation exercise
    in yoga is a classic example of sun worship. I choose to worship the creator of the sun. Being of Indian descent, I’ve always associated yoga with hinduism even as a child. For me, I love to dance or do aerobics to burn the calories away and spend time in prayer for my meditation. Ive been healthy all my life even after having 4 kids, for the Eucharist is my greatest comfort.